High replayability and variety
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“the randomisation of maps, events, and available build options means every game will play differently.”
Steam review · 96.5 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$19.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
A short, board-game-like Mars terraforming card roguelike with great replayability and tough optimization. Skip it if you want a relaxing colony builder or hate RNG and timers.
Great for
Fans of Terraforming Mars, euro board games and roguelike deckbuilders who enjoy optimizing short runs
Main risk
It's a RNG-driven card puzzle with a support timer, not a relaxed colony builder, and gets repetitive
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“the randomisation of maps, events, and available build options means every game will play differently.”
Steam review · 96.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“it is largely due to the unbridled optimism that the whole game feels to have.”
Steam review · 124.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“There is a meta progression that allows you to unlock new cards to play that open up more strategies”
Steam review · 157.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“One of the very few games I've been steadily increasing the difficulty level on for nearly a hundred hours”
Steam review · 90.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Definitely more of a board game than a colony sim, it manages to have a really nice decision space where every decision feels impactful but not overwhelming.”
Steam review · 12.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“I love how I can play a session within a the time of a 1-hour lunch break.”
Steam review · 1441.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Do 1-3 and you've seen 90%+ of the game. It just doesn't have enough content/depth to justify its price.”
Steam review · 12.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“the pool of "projects" (essentially cards) you choose from every turn gets seriously diluted the more you play and unlock stuff, making it overly reliant on RNG.”
Steam review · 6.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Mars doesn't fail because the people are starving, or lacking air, or lacking water, or lacking ANY resource... BUT BECAUSE OF ARBITRARY BLEEDING OF "SUPPORT."”
Steam review · 5.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“It is NOT colony builder game (games like Surviving Mars/Aftermath, Per Aspera, Cities Skylines, Banished etc.) - in its basis it is card game”
Steam review · 9.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“being locked into a single save until I beat it - and across computers via the cloud no less - is a complete deal breaker.”
Steam review · 5.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 negative reviews
“Every single game mode is rush rush rush hurry hurry hurry.”
Steam review · 41.6 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Atmospheric frozen world and visuals
− Poor optimization, low FPS and stutter
analyzed 9 d ago

+ Pals as workers and base building
− Late-game grind
analyzed 21 d ago

+ Fun, tense survival with strong potential
− No way to fight without a weapon
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Tribe management and automation
− Clunky, confusing UI and tribe menus
analyzed 3 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click