Free and runs on low-end PCs
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“its free, takes little space, runs well on a toaster, graphics good”
Steam review · 2.7 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A free, lightweight, low-poly Battlefield-style shooter with fun gunplay. Skip it if cheaters, slow grind, few maps and a neglected, thin player base would bother you.
Great for
Players on low-end PCs who want a free, casual Battlefield-style shooter for short sessions
Main risk
Cheaters, rough newbie matchmaking and grind in a barely updated game with few servers and maps
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“its free, takes little space, runs well on a toaster, graphics good”
Steam review · 2.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“It's really enjoyable to shoot, and the matches are fast and exciting.”
Steam review · 2.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“Fun, easy to play. It is like a purified Battlefield.”
Steam review · 24.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“the use of simple geometric shapes and bold colors creates a visually appealing atmosphere that’s both clean and dynamic”
Steam review · 1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 30 positive reviews
“also remember this is a 1 developer game and i think it was a great job.”
Steam review · 4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“you will find more cheaters in here that on tinder”
Steam review · 29.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“everything is locked behind not only levels but also hours upon hours of grinding”
Steam review · 1.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“I'm getting put into lobbies where enemy players are from level 22 up to level 50 and on my team the highest level player would be level 20.”
Steam review · 0.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“You get one or two servers and can no longer start your own without paying cash money.”
Steam review · 21.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“5 years later... little to no updates happening, few servers, low player counters that are getting worse and worse.”
Steam review · 15.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“Playing the same map so many times is incredibly painful.”
Steam review · translated · 1.4 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Noticeably improves aim
− Paywalls and subscription pushed everywhere
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Fast, intense, high-skill, addictive loop
− Rampant cheaters and weak anti-cheat
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Unique skiing and jetpack movement
− Developer Hi-Rez abandoned the game
analyzed 1 min ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click